Still Not Finished With Shai and His New Israel Fund Buddies!

Math doesn't lie, but Shai sure tries

Recently the United Nations released another one of its famous clown reports accusing Israel of war crimes for having the audacity to defend itself from missiles shot out of Gaza. These reports are usually sourced from a buffet of anti Israel NGOs, and this one was no exception. B’tselem alone was cited seventy two times. Seventy two citations from an organization whose entire business model is making sure Israel is blamed for waking up in the morning.

Now normally, this is where Shai Robkin and the public relations wizards at the New Israel Fund swerve in with their greatest hit: “We do not support BDS.” They say this with the same expression children use when insisting they did not eat the chocolate that is shmeared all across their entire face.

Let us review the basic relationships.

The NIF funds B’tselem.
B’tselem promotes BDS.
Therefore, unless arithmetic has also been politicized, the NIF bankrolls the infrastructure that keeps BDS alive.

Now in math form:

NIF = B’tselem
B’tselem = BDS
Therefore, NIF = BDS

Add Shai’s deep involvement with the NIF and the equation becomes even easier.

Shai = NIF
NIF = BDS
Therefore, Shai = BDS

Using basic math that is presumably far above Shai’s head, we can determine that he is a supporter of BDS. Or he can just admit it out loud instead of being duplicitous.

Now let us examine what BDS actually exists to do. The entire purpose of BDS is to weaken Israel economically and isolate it diplomatically so that enemies can crush it. You do not need a PhD in Middle East studies to spot the endgame. When you work to destabilize the only Jewish country in the world, the logical consequence is that millions of Jews are placed in existential danger.

We can therefore summarize the ideology as follows:

BDS seeks outcomes that have historically resulted in mass harm to Jews.
Those outcomes resemble the strategic goals of regimes that tried to eliminate Jewish life.

This is not hyperbole. It is the natural conclusion of the ideology. If you target the survival mechanisms of a nation surrounded by enemies, catastrophe is not a possibility. It is a guarantee.

Now we previously established that Shai aligns himself with BDS through the organizations he promotes and funds. When someone chooses to support groups that push policies hostile to Jewish safety, that person is aligning themselves, willingly or not, with dangers that mirror the threats Jews have faced from history’s worst actors.

So:

Shai = BDS
BDS pursues policies that endanger Jews
Therefore, Shai’s ideological math places him on the side of movements that place Jews in danger

This is simply the transitive property, fifth grade math. The kind of thing Shai might want to review before insisting that the organizations he bankrolls are innocent community service projects.

Do not you just love math?